Commerce Clause

Court’s health care ruling to have impact on commerce – Seacoastonline.com

Mother Jones

Court's health care ruling to have impact on commerce Seacoastonline.com At stake will be issues such as a 21st century interpretation of the 18th century Commerce Clause (Article 1, Section 8) in the Constitution, which permitted Congress "to regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with … The Obamacare Ruling I'd Like to SeeMother Jones 5 Reasons George Washington Would Be Disgusted With Obamacare BattlePolicyMic Eve of DestructionPower Line (blog) National Review Online (blog) all 5 news articles »

Supreme court ruling on healthcare law – live coverage – The Guardian

The Guardian

Supreme court ruling on healthcare law – live coverage The Guardian 10.12am: So the individual mandate appears to have survived as constitutional, not under the commerce clause but as a tax, and that Chief Justice Roberts has joined the "liberal" wing of the court on the issue. More important news: the Medicaid … Supreme Court Health Care Decision LIVE Stream: Obamacare PredictionsPolicyMic Four ways the Supreme Court could split the difference on health careWashington Post (blog) Local observers predict high court will rule narrowly on health reform lawCapital Times Reason Online (blog) -ABC News -Boston Globe all 6,317 news articles »

Tea Party Leader: Federal Tort Reform Kills State Sovereignty – Legal Examiner

Tea Party Leader: Federal Tort Reform Kills State Sovereignty Legal Examiner He knows that Obamacare and federal tort reform bills are "the Wickard twins," equally unconstitutional ideas arising from the Supreme Court decision in 1942 that unleashed a runaway Commerce Clause on an unsuspecting American public. States' and …

Governor Markell Sued for Cronyism: Illegal Scheme Forces Ratepayers to Pick … – Daily Caller

Daily Caller

Governor Markell Sued for Cronyism: Illegal Scheme Forces Ratepayers to Pick … Daily Caller In addition to arguing that the exclusion of companies like FuelCell violates the dormant Commerce Clause, Abbasi of CoA asserted that “ there is no rational basis for this particular subset of Delaware residents to bear the cost of this subsidy … and more »

Supreme Court Affordable Care Act Decision Obamacare Must Be Struck Down – PolicyMic

PolicyMic

Supreme Court Affordable Care Act Decision Obamacare Must Be Struck Down PolicyMic This Thursday, the Supreme Court is expected to issue its ruling in the landmark challenge to the Affordable Care Act. While upholding the law would further entrench the court's already incomprehensible Commerce Clause jurisprudence, striking down the …

Vid: Wheat, Wheat, & Obamacare – How the Commerce Clause Made Congress … – Reason Online (blog)

Mother Jones

Vid: Wheat, Wheat, & Obamacare – How the Commerce Clause Made Congress … Reason Online (blog) As the nation waits on the Supreme Court's ruling on the Affordable Care Act (a.k.a. Obamacare), it's worth taking a look at the 2010 ReasonTV video that the New York Times recently cited as one of the reasons why the individual mandate is under legal … Obamacare and “Commerce:” Does A Include Not-A?Tenth Amendment Center Even the Most Conservative Supreme Court Justices Have Already Declared …New Republic (blog) ACA's Mandate is Nothing New, and the Supreme Court Knows ItMother Jones NewsMax.com -Heritage.org (blog) -The Guardian (blog) all 25 news articles »

Health Care Decision Hinges On A Crucial Clause – NPR

Health Care Decision Hinges On A Crucial Clause NPR The court's first major Commerce Clause decision came in the 1824. The great Chief Justice John Marshall, who was himself one of the Founding Fathers, wrote in Gibbons v. Ogden that the Commerce Clause gives Congress broad power to regulate … and more »

A History of Interstate Commerce Part 2: Rebels Without a Clause – OpenMarket.org

A History of Interstate Commerce Part 2: Rebels Without a Clause OpenMarket.org The Articles of Confederation, which preceded the Constitution, lacked a Commerce Clause. The federal government had no power to regulate commerce among the.

Scalia Reverses Himself: Now Disagrees With Key Precedent Supporting … – TPM

TPM

Scalia Reverses Himself: Now Disagrees With Key Precedent Supporting … TPM To observers of the 'Obamacare' oral arguments, it would come as no surprise that Justice Antonin Scalia is a likely vote to strike it down. But there has remained one major wrinkle in his prior jurisprudence that continues to give… Healthcare and Scalia's Broken Moral CompassThe Nation. (blog) Scalia Reverses Long-Held View On Landmark Precedent Just In Time To Strike …Ology Reading Tea Leaves on ObamaCareCommentary Examiner.com -United Liberty -Politico all 154 news articles »

• Supreme court ruling on healthcare law – live coverage
• Don’t believe the spin: workers will lose out, thanks to Beecroft | Anya Palmer
• Politics live blog + PMQs: Wednesday 16 May 2012
• Paul Clement: lawyer for the states emerges still hungry for healthcare fight
• Romney on a roll after Rubio endorsement – Thursday 29 March
• US supreme court healthcare hearing, day three: panel opinion
• US supreme court to consider final arguments on Obama’s health reforms
• The supreme court healthcare hearing, day two: panel opinion | Martha Davis, Mark Hall and Scott Lemieux
• Supreme court health care case – Tuesday 27 March

• dwallbank: Roberts’ giant caveat (allowable only as tax) still appears to limit Congress’ powers under the Commerce Clause.
• sethraza: RT @sanaali_: WOW. The Court UPHOLDS under the Commerce Clause!
• NewzGroup: RT @LRockwellatty: SCOTUS rejected main Commerce Clause argument; went for the alternative argument & upheld it under the taxing authority. #lessonforlawyers
• Vinformative: CNN has lead with Dewey beats Truman. Hey CNN, mandate unconstitutional via commerce clause, but constitutional as a tax. Read the decision.
• karlb21: RT @foxnewsradio: … Individual mandate has been struck down as a commerce clause, BUT may survive as a Tax. Waiting for more. @JeffBishop
• gm00re1: RT @YaseminAyarci: Upheld under Commerce clause! Woo!
• CaitTeare: RT @DavidMDrucker: #SCOTUS apears to have ruled that mandate under Commerce Clause is unconstitutional.But is Constitutional as tax-& Court views it to be tax.
• SharinKhander: RT @FreedomWorks: RT @DeanClancy: The Individual Mandate: Unconstitutional under Commerce Clause. CONSTITUTIONAL as a series of 20 taxes. #judgmentday
• write2run: @magsol Apparently they ruled no under commerce clause, yes as a tax. I’m trying to parse this out…